Skip to main content

"Second Coming" Kookiness: what the library says

I want to follow up on last week’s Adult Forum titled, “The Second Coming/Rapture/Apocalypse: What the Bible Really Says and Why Most of What You Are Hearing is Full-Goose-Bozo-Crazy-Kookiness.”

I’d like to summarize that Forum for those of you who couldn’t attend, and offer some further thoughts.

The first thing to remember whenever someone says, “The Bible says ________” about anything (the use of wealth, homosexuality, the role of women in leadership positions, who Jesus is and how we are saved, etc.) is that “the” Bible is not “a” singular book, but a library of books: 39 in the Old Testament and 27 in the New Testament.

Ask yourself: how would you react if someone walked up to you and said, “You know, the library says that________”?

You’d think that’s a crazy thing to say. And you’d be right.

There were many different apocalyptic theories that were out there before Jesus’ time, and even in the New Testament, there is not one or two, but three or four different takes on the Second Coming.

In other words, in scripture, there is no single perspective on the issue. As the theologian and Biblical scholar William Placher writes, “Some Christians in the New Testament period thought that Christ was about to return, others did not. Christians ever since have held both views -- and all can find New Testament support for their positions.”

Even more interesting to me is Placher’s point that the apostle Paul and many other early Christians began with a conviction Jesus was about to return, gradually realized they’d been wrong, but that realization never shook their faith.

It’s fascinating to me to see that a tenet of faith in Christ that was important early on turned out to be not so essential to that faith.

Resist the temptation of rigid thinkers to convince you that there has been “a historic faith” since the days of Jesus, which (conveniently) they happen to be the ones protecting, and which we modern people are someone unique in “tampering with.”

Recall that major, traumatic theological changes (the Second Coming not coming, the inclusion of Gentiles without requiring circumcision and observance of dietary laws, the split between Eastern and Western Christendom, Protestant Reformation’s suggestion that scripture should be accessible in one’s own language, and that people can have direct access to God, etc.) have always happened throughout Christian history -- at least when the church did not have the power to suppress those ideas before they could take root.

Finally, a word about the absurdity of predicting any Biblical prophecy with any certainty about dates: it would be next to impossible to predict precisely when something could happen in the future, based on Jesus’ life.

What day and year is it today?

We’d say May 19, 2011. But “2011” is based on the year of Jesus’ birth. When did that happen? Biblical scholars put it anywhere between what we’d call A.D. (the abbreviation for the Latin term for “the year of the Lord”) 1 or 3. Accuracy in calendars (what day, or month, or even year it is) is a relatively recent phenomenon.

We’d call this month “May.” But there was a great change in the calendar (we lost 13 days) when we switched from the Julian to the Gregorian calendars.

If I were writing this e-Pistle prior to that change, “today” would actually be May 6.

So you see the absurdity of predicting things down to the year, or even the day.

Bottom line: Jesus himself, who we believe was God incarnate, said even he didn’t know the day or hour when human history would culminate. Just be ready, he said -- if not for “the” end, at least for “your” end, because you don’t know the day or time.

That’s not supposed to make us anxious. It’s supposed to make us embrace every hour of every day of every year.

Of which, I pray, we’ll have many, many more!

See you Sunday!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Let's Unpack One Trump Tweet on Refugees

No one can  -- and I certainly don't want to try -- to unpack every tweet the person currently holding the office of President of the United States sends out.

No one has the time to respond to every one of his tweets on just one issue. Although I wish I had the time on the issue of the Executive Orders recently issued in regard to refugees.

But every so often I feel I MUST respond to at least SOME of those tweets, lest I grow accustomed to them as normal. And I refuse to normalize the abnormal. 

Take one of Saturday's tweets, for example: in response to Judge Robart's temporarily stopping an Executive Orders, there was this: 



“What is our country coming to when a judge can halt a Homeland Security travel ban and anyone, even with bad intentions, can come into U.S.?” 

Let's unpack: 

"What is our country coming to..." 
Does that lament sound familiar? Ask yourself: who often says it, where do you hear it from the most? Is it a positive, hopeful line of thinking? I wil…

The Beatitudes, Lady Liberty, and Refugees

A sermon preached January 29, 2017
The Rev. John Ohmer, Rector
The Falls Church Episcopal

When Jesus saw the crowds, he went up the mountain; and after he sat down, his disciples came to him. Then he began to speak, and taught them, saying:

“Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.

“Blessed are those who mourn, for they will be comforted.

“Blessed are the meek, for they will inherit the earth.

“Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for righteousness, for they will be filled.

“Blessed are the merciful, for they will receive mercy.

“Blessed are the pure in heart, for they will see God.

“Blessed are the peacemakers, for they will be called children of God.

“Blessed are those who are persecuted for righteousness’ sake, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.

“Blessed are you when people revile you and persecute you and utter all kinds of evil against you falsely on my account. Rejoice and be glad, for your reward is great in heaven, for in the same way they persecuted the p…