Skip to main content

A Thank You (and Rebuttal) to Mr. Douthat

Ross Douthat of the New York Times writes a provocative article “Can Liberal Christianity be Saved?”

Especially when compared to a recent piece in the Wall Street Journal that has already been roundly dismissed as a pure-and-simple hatchet job, Douthat’s NYT article raises good, valid questions.

For example, he is right on target when he writes:

What should be wished for…is that liberal Christianity [recover] a religious reason for its own existence. As the liberal Protestant scholar Gary Dorrien has pointed out, the Christianity that animated causes such as the Social Gospel and the civil rights movement was much more dogmatic than present-day liberal faith. Its leaders had a “deep grounding in Bible study, family devotions, personal prayer and worship.” They argued for progressive reform in the context of “a personal transcendent God ... the divinity of Christ, the need of personal redemption and the importance of Christian missions.”

Today, by contrast, the leaders of the Episcopal Church and similar bodies often don’t seem to be offering anything you can’t already get from a purely secular liberalism. Which suggests that perhaps they should pause, amid their frantic renovations, and consider not just what they would change about historic Christianity, but what they would defend and offer uncompromisingly to the world.

There’s good news, however.

First, from my participation in movements within the Episcopal Church (The Gathering of Leaders, The Bible Challenge, and The Restoration Project, to name three) I can say that Mr. Douthat’s observations have not gone unnoticed. Indeed there is, through these efforts and others, a movement afoot in the Episcopal Church to recover ancient, grounding practices and rootedness not in any political agenda of the left or right but the Gospel of Jesus Christ. And anecdotally speaking – I wish I had the numbers – in those churches where these practices are taking place, attendance is up.  

Second, having just returned from the Episcopal Church’s General Convention (where I was an issues writer for the Center Aisle, my dioceses’ daily opinion journal) I can say that many Generation X and Millennial generation Christians share the frustration Douthat names here – that many leaders in the Episcopal Church are indistinguishable from leaders in progressive (or conservative) social movements. And they are ready to set aside political squabbling and posturing in favor of focusing on what unifies us. Younger generation clergy, joined by kindred spirits in the Baby Boomer generation, are in fact interested in recovering what we should “offer uncompromisingly to the world” – the unconditional and transformative love of God made known in Jesus Christ – not so much because it will change Christianity, but because it will change our hearts and souls, and the world.

So thanks to Mr. Douthat for raising those points.  

However, I would like to take a minute here to challenge three assumptions that Mr. Douthat makes.

The first assumption is that official stances taken at the General Convention – and granted, they are very liberal – are representative of the vast majority of Episcopal churches and Episcopalians nationwide. That is a much like saying the official platform of the Democratic or Republican party is representative of the average rank and file Democrat or Republican. Is that so? An equally strong case can be made that those who get elected to, and end up approving such positions or platforms are not the most representative of the rank and file, but simply the most organized, motivated, and outspoken. In other words, it’s not fair to judge a typical Episcopal Church by its elected leadership’s official positions.

The second assumption Mr. Douthat makes is that the decline in numbers in the Episcopal Church is due to the liberal positions taken by the most visible aspect of the Episcopal Church. Absent “exit interviews” with those who are no longer Episcopalians, or interviews with those not attending at all, how does one know that is the reason numbers are declining? There is a “cause and effect” argument that is assumed here, but never made. Could there not be other reasons for the decline? As a retired bishop of this church recently pointed out to me, the Episcopal Church peaked in the 1950’s when people were (generally speaking) joining an institution, not becoming disciples of a person. Those people are now leaving, or dying. As the Episcopal Church and other denominations enter a post-Christendom age rooted less in institution-joining and more in disciple-becoming, numbers – numbers based on institution-joiners – will decline. It doesn’t necessarily have anything to do with the official stances of the Christendom-era churches.  

Which brings me to the third assumption: that declining numbers are something about which we should be alarmed. As I wrote for the Center Aisle, the underlying assumption behind many much angst in church circles seems to be that declining membership in the Episcopal Church is an indicator of a machinery somehow broken, that we now must fix. But that is a mechanistic, not organic (or Scriptural) point of view. What if declining membership was a pruning process, the natural and healthy dying-off of the now-fruitless branches of the 1950’s era institution-joining Episcopalians? If we believed God is the one behind this pruning process, our energies would shift from trying to “fix” something ourselves to trusting that God is doing what needs done to cause new growth.  

In other words, when individual Christians are – and Christianity itself is – rooted in the True Vine, it must change, and does grow.  


  1. Excellent thoughts and points, John. Thank you.

  2. Crucial to point out the difference between institution- joining and disciple-becoming. Excellent piece!

  3. ...and isn't the periodic pruning of the vines the key to renewed growth? The painful process of removing what (and even who) is extraneous to discipleship, of reshaping the winding of vines around the wires, all looks like death to the uninvolved observer. But it is life-giving in the end. You are right. Metrics alone do not tell the story.Thanks, John.

  4. Hopefully, those of us in the pews will begin to hear more about the positive "new growth" from the True Vine that the inclination to leave the dying old vine is purged. Show me more, let me hear more, bring me into those places of "renewed" growth. I desire a renewed sense of Episcopal / Anglican unity founded upon Scripture. I don't want to leave....I am a disciple needing Apostles who desire to follow The Way.

  5. I read this post at the Cafe, and I want to thank you for this articulate post. Too few disciples, loads of fans-- that seems to be the problem today, especially.

  6. Dear John:

    Amen! Thanks for writing this and thank you for mentioning The Bible Challenge. The Center for Biblical Studies is humbled and astounded that The Bible Challenge has moved from one parish to over 1,000 in 15 countries in less than a year. Each of these Episcopal or Anglican churches is getting back to something ancient and basic. Archbishop Thomas Cranmer never proposed reading the Daily Lectionary, but reading a chapter of the Old Testament and a chapter of the New Testament every day with no verses listed and nothing ommitted. The Bible Challenge is simply a way to help people inside and outside our churches return to an ancient and proven way of engaging God daily through Scripture so that we become contagious Christians with a strong faith that can be articulated, lived and shared as we develop a life-long spiritual discipline of daily Scripture reading. We are seeing lots of lives being transformed and churches coming alive. We also have 24 Episcopal and Anglican bishoips leading their entire dioceses in The Bible Challenge and at least three more committed to leading their dioceses in 2013. The word (or Word) is out. We need to get back to basics. We need to equip our members and those outside our churches to do something spiritual each day, rather that solely hoping and waiting for them to come to church on Sunday. Those who engage in reading God's Word each day are much more likely to want to be with us on Sunday, to share the Word with others and to come to church alive and seeking to grow deeper and to support and care for others than straggling in spiritually exhausted and starring down the preacher as if to say, "It's all up to you. Either preach an amazing sermon and sing three of my favorite hymns or else you won't see me for a few months." The latter way is no way to make disciples of Christ. The former way is the way to build strong Christians and churches that grow and transform the community and world around them. Thanks for being a great Episcopal leader. We need to clone you!
    With every blessing, Marek


Post a Comment

Comments encouraged. In the interest of responsible dialog, those commenting must sign with their full name. To prove you're a human and not a spam-bot, I've had to include a word verification step...sorry about that.

Popular posts from this blog

If there's a will, there's a way.

For Lent, I was thinking of doing the typical fasts: fast from Facebook and take up reading, fast from petty vices like overindulging in sweets and alcohol and take on moderation, yada yada yada.
But I'm re-thinking that this year.
What I'm fasting from this Lent is discouragement. That means cutting back on what is so often the source of discouragement, which is a tendency to gorge on, or dwell on, bad news.
(Let me be clear: that does not mean giving up news or otherwise burying my head in the sand: it means staying informed while finding ways not to get pulled into a downward spiral of feelings of numbness and helplessness; it means giving up unproductive feelings like hopelessness and resignation and taking on visible behaviors like giving encouragement and taking action.)
It means making visible -- here, on my blog, and even on Facebook -- the good.
Because the problem is -- to paraphrase the community organizer Rich Harwood -- a lot of times we see "good news stories…

Fasting from Discouragement, Making Visible the Good

So for Lent, I was thinking of doing the typical fasts: fast from Facebook and take up reading, fast from petty vices like overindulging in sweets and alcohol and take on moderation, yada yada yada.

But I'm re-thinking that.
Now one of the things I'm thinking about fasting from during Lent is discouragement. That means cutting back on what is so often the source of discouragement, which is a tendency to gorge on, or dwell on, bad news.
That would mean taking on encouragement: to make visible -- even on Facebook -- the good.
Because the problem is -- to paraphrase the community organizer Rich Harwood -- a lot of times we see "good news stories" as being quaint -- they are tossed in at the end of the news as an inspiring story, or put in the style section. But stories of good things happening -- people coming together to do things, is not a touchy-feely, feel-good story, but something affecting real change.
So for starters: I'm inspired by the leadership example of…